The debate continues on Twitter about whether Hispanic immigrants tend to litter more.
On a related issue, General Social Survey interviewers rated the homes of respondents in terms of cleanliness from 'very clean' (1) to 'dirty' (5). I calculated the means for those born in the US and those who were not (sample size = 7,062). The mean for native-borns is 1.96, the mean for immigrants is 1.86, so immigrants are not messier, they're cleaner.
What if we look by ethnic group and immigrant status? Let's limit the analysis to groups with at least 100 respondents. I'll put immigrant means in parentheses.
Mean unclean house score
Blacks 2.17 (2.02)
Mexican 2.00 (2.05)
Irish 1.98 (1.60)
Scottish 1.95 (1.89)
German 1.88 (1.68)
English/Welsh 1.84 (1.68)
Polish 1.84 (1.55)
Italian 1.77 (1.89)
Immigrants tend to be cleaner than native-borns. Mexican and Italian immigrants are the exceptions with slightly higher means than their American-born counterparts. On the question of Mexican immigrants, their score is only surpassed by blacks.
UPDATE: As I indicated, the debate actually focuses on Hispanics, not just Mexicans. The mean for all Hispanic immigrants is 1.90. For native-born Latinos, it's 2.03--a mean that is very close to that of Mex-Ams, and is only surpassed by blacks.
The General Social Survey rated the skin darkness of a sample of black Americans, ranging from "very dark brown" to "very lig...
In the comments in the last post , some readers contended that Jews are not ethnocentric. Using the same question I used in the comments se...
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...