The May/June 2010 issue of the American Psychologist has an article on the problem of immigrant acculturation. One section focuses on the "immigration paradox." This refers to the fact that the more an immigrant is assimilated, the greater the risk of bad health outcomes. This is the case for psychiatric disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, bad eating habits, obesity, diabetes--just about anything you want to examine. It's such a big problem, it gets it's own name (that's Immigrant Paradox, in case you missed it).
But for some reason, among the list of policy recommendations, I can't see the obvious suggestion that we discourage folks from moving to unhealthy America, and that we encourage them to return home if they're already here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
I think you are misunderstanding the paradox. The immigrants are healthier in America than they are in their native countries. They just get less healthy as they assimilate.
ReplyDeleteThat is even after assimilating they are still healthier than they would be in their native countries. The health hierarchy would go:
ReplyDelete* Mexicans in America (Mexico-born)
* Mexicans in America (US-born)
* Mexicans in Mexico
http://lung-cancer.emedtv.com/lung-cancer/lung-cancer-statistics.html
ReplyDeleteAge at Diagnosis
From 1998 to 2003, the median age at lung cancer diagnosis was 70 years of age. The percentages of people diagnosed with lung cancer based on age were as follows:
•0.0 percent were diagnosed under age 20
•0.3 percent between 20 and 34
•2.1 percent between 35 and 44
•8.8 percent between 45 and 54
•21.1 percent between 55 and 64
•32.6 percent between 65 and 74
•28.2 percent between 75 and 84
•6.9 percent 85+ years of age.
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/cri/content/cri_2_4_1x_what_are_the_key_statistics_about_lung_cancer_15.asp
Lung cancer mainly occurs in older people. About 2 out of 3 people diagnosed with lung cancer are older than 65; fewer than 3% of all cases are found in people younger than 45. The average age at the time of diagnosis is about 71. Lung cancer mainly occurs in older people. About 2 out of 3 people diagnosed with lung cancer are older than 65; fewer than 3% of all cases are found in people younger than 45. The average age at the time of diagnosis is about 71.
http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/lung/riskfactors/index.htm
A lifelong male smoker has a cumulative risk of 15.9% for developing lung cancer by age 75.
No kidding. The older you are, the more likely it is that you will die of something.