How can the seemingly immaterial experience of consciousness be explained by the material neurons of the brain? There seems to be an unbridgeable gap between understanding the brain as an objectively observed biological organ and accounting for the subjective experiences that come from the brain (and life processes). In this book, Todd Feinberg and Jon Mallatt attempt to demystify consciousness―to naturalize it, by explaining that the subjective, experiencing aspects of consciousness are created by natural brain processes that evolved in natural ways. Although subjective experience is unique in nature, they argue, it is not necessarily mysterious. We need not invoke the unknown or unknowable to explain its creation.I haven't read the book (it's not out yet), and maybe I can find the time, but call me a big skeptic. My experience from the inside IS immaterial and is categorically separate from the material universe as understood by science. I assume these authors will more or less argue that my subjective experience is some sort of trick generated by my brain. This is simply absurd. I THINK the material world is real, but like the philosophers tell us, for all I know some demon is causing me to hallucinate the world. But I KNOW with utter certainty that I am really experiencing stuff right now. If that is to be doubted, all bets are off.
Friday, July 13, 2018
Consciousness explained naturally? Doubt it
From Amazon's description of a new book on consciousness:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
The nature of consciousness is the big mystery -- I won't even say 'unsolved problem' -- facing us.
ReplyDeleteIt's surely something that will require the mother of all 'paradigm shifts' ... perhaps more of a philosophical leap than a scientific one ... of the sort that we experienced when we went from the Age of Faith to the Age of Reason.
And ... it may not be possible to make such a leap. It's not beyond the bounds of belief, that I can teach a chimpanzee to do simple arithmetic. If someone claimed to have done so, I wouldn't dismiss them out of hand, I'd want to see the evidence.
But if they claimed to have taught a chimpanzee to solve second-order partial differential equations ... really solve them, not just hit a key on a laptop ... I'd just want to see how they did the trick.
So .. .maybe, with respect to understanding consciousness, we're locked in a 'cognitive cage' ... literally unable to comprehend the reality required to understand consciousness ... or maybe we'll get out of the cage when genetic engineering gives us better brains.
My hunch is that the 'nature of consciousness' is related to the astonishing non-understandability of quantum reality. And if we can make serious progress in one of these areas, maybe it will unlock the mysteries of the other.