Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Proof positive that mainstream social science is pure superstition: I just remembered two things I learned in grad school, and was too stupid to put them side by side and see their absurdity. I was taught by Ivy League faculty that: 1) (hetero)sexual attraction is socially constructed; and 2) homosexuality is inherited. So, heterosexuality is not from nature, but homosexuality is!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
Where you told these 2 things by the same person? And how does this prove that social science is "pure superstition"?
ReplyDeleteArguing with a liberal....is like saying "Thats an Orange!" and getting a reply "There is no objective proof of that!"
ReplyDeleteCompare the reaction to an Ivy League president's moderate statement on sex differences to the business-as-usual attitude toward the blatant contradiction Ron experience from those same Ivy League institutions.
ReplyDeleteIt's clear something is _seriously_ out of whack with sociology departments that can get all bent about one and not the other.
Of course, no one cares as long as the Ivy League keeps turning out "leaders" -- even if those "leaders" do turn out to be merely a kinder, gentler version of Mugabe.