Sunday, June 14, 2009

Candor!

THIS is the type of candor about ethnic groups I was talking about! Fun stuff. Never mind whether it's accurate or not. It's honest.

UPDATE: Skip to about 8:45 if you only have a minute. If you like that and have time, watch parts 2 and 3.

11 comments:

Jim Bowery said...

Save yourself some tedium and fast skip to 9:00.

Ron Guhname said...

Jim: Good point. Parts 2 and 3 continue the good stuff.

Burke said...

I support Israel. But I must say that part of the reason I support Israel, a big part, is that I wish all or most Jews in the US/Europe would just move there, permanently. Is that so bad?

If some stay, that's fine. But it seems to me that only a couple options are viable in order to maintain a healthy, strong Euro society in the US/Europe. Either separation within the US/Europe, like the Hasids in Brooklyn, where they live peacefully and productively among themselves, but stay out of the mainstream, or complete assimilation and melding into the majority population. Enough so that their descendants 2 or 3 generations from now would not be conscious, or even aware of that part of their ancestry.

Anonymous said...

This woman is a paranoid schizophrenic, as a perusal of a few more of her videos will demonstrate. The one on the large hadron collider, for instance.

The Undiscovered Jew said...

I support Israel, a big part, is that I wish all or most Jews in the US/Europe would just move there, permanently.

Hitler already got rid of the bulk of the Western European Jewish population for you. Thanks to him, today the EU political elite is overwhelimingly gentile.

And thank God the EU elites are gentiles - rather than Jews - or else Western Europe would be under the control of a Satanic, Globalistic, antinationalist, antiwhite, and mindlessly bureaucractic semi-Dictatorship.

Jim Bowery said...

Post WW II Western Europe was a creature of the United States.

Anonymous said...

Jim Bowery,



I read your essay on the punishment "system" in America in regards to the cruel and unusual punishments (rape, gang beatings) in our prisons. I have to agree with you. I have thought that for a long while myself. We pride ourselves that we dont abide cruel-and-unusual punishment, but that is what our modern prisons, where many men get raped, infected with HIV, beaten or stabbed, are there to do. In my opinion the elite love this because it keeps the regular guys at the office in line........and not taking a swing at the overbearing boss, or the judge who gives his financial life away to his ex-wife, etc. It keeps the citizen-taxpayer-soldiers of this nation firmly in line because the alternative (state prison in all its ugliness) is so horrible that the populace will put up with many wrongs via the state rather than risk it.

Our founding fathers would be ashamed to high heaven at what our prisons have become and the inhumanity that goes on within them. We are harboring systemitized barbarity (really a form of terrorism inflicted upon the populace) to enforce the law.

The Undiscovered Jew said...

Post WW II Western Europe was a creature of the United States.

The United States' involvement with postwar Western Europe mostly revolved around economic, foreign policy, and military cooperation to deter a Warsaw Pact invasion and rebuild Europe.

The US government did not and does not have any control over European social trends or immigration policy.

The popularity of transnationalism came about due to a backlash against the old European right which was blamed for the nationalism that led to WWI and for later appeasing or going into alliance with Hitler.

For the elites, "postnationalism" came into vogue because thinkers such as Jean Monnet
and leaders such as DeGaulle felt the only way Western Europe could compete geopolitically against both the United States and the Soviet Union was for Western Europe to integrate itself into a pan-national government.

Furthermore, the idea of Europe uniting to prevent future wars on the Continent predates the United States becoming a superpower:

Pre-1945 ideas on European unity

Following the catastrophe of the First World War, some thinkers and visionaries again began to float the idea of a politically unified Europe. In 1923, the Austrian Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi founded the Pan-Europa movement and hosted the First Paneuropean Congress, held in Vienna in 1926. The aim was for a specifically Christian, and by implication Roman Catholic, Europe. In contrast Trotsky raised the slogan "For a Soviet United States of Europe" in 1923, for a non-Christian but communist Europe.

In 1929, Aristide Briand, French prime minister, gave a speech in the presence of the League of Nations Assembly in which he proposed the idea of a federation of European nations based on solidarity and in the pursuit of economic prosperity and political and social co-operation. Many eminent economists, among them John Maynard Keynes, supported this view. At the League's request Briand presented a Memorandum on the organisation of a system of European Federal Union in 1930.

In 1931 the French politician Edouard Herriot published the book The United States of Europe. The British civil servant Arthur Salter published a book of the same name in 1933.

Between the two world wars the Polish leader Józef Piłsudski envisaged the idea of a United States of central Europe (called Międzymorze translated as "Intersea" or "Between-seas"), a Polish-orientated version of Mitteleuropa.

The Great Depression, the rise of fascism and communism and subsequently World War II prevented the inter war movements from gaining further support.

Jim Bowery said...

Pan Europeanism is actually a form of white nationalism, or at least white pan-nationalism. So, of course, one would not expect it to be the favorite pastime of Jews unless, of course, it is a Judeo-Christian pan-nationalism.

But Jews aren't really well adapted to technological civilization, so when they follow their group instincts to break down barriers to immigration, they just don't know when to quit and that is what gave rise to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 -- along with a hefty dose of Vatican IIism.

Anonymous said...

If Jewish people make the argument that they have the highest mean IQ, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with that (its fact)? The part that sounds dangerous is when she claims that Jewish people are morally better or more spiritually advanced than non-Jews. This is what makes her an extremist. Most people on Storm-Front don't even express that kind of "supremacy." She probably teaches somewhere in the Ivy League?

John said...

Here reasoning is extraordinarily bad. She argues that blacks are good at math and physics because they are good at dance and music. Let's see, spiders (some) are incredibly good at making incredibly strong webs of intricate design, then they most be geniuses at engineering, physics, and math. Ridiculous!