Saturday, February 12, 2011

Do prisoners have fewer kids?

I finally found some data on the question of the family size of people who have served time in prison. (Reader Mark Wethman e-mailed me about this a few weeks ago). I suspect that the hope is that ex-cons have fewer kids, so that America's current practice of mass incarceration has an unintended eugenic effect. 

The MIDUS Study asked people how many children they have, and if they have ever served time in prison. The problem is that researchers wanted to know how the number of biological, adopted, and step-children all added up. These days quite a few people have non-biological children, and I would expect ex-cons to have more because of greater relationship instability. Here are the means:

Mean number of children (sample size = 1,937, ages 45+)

Men
Served time 2.71
Did not 2.62

Women
Served time 2.79
Did not 2.70

Men and women who have been in prison have slightly higher means, but notice how the means are high for all groups. The numbers are inflated by non-biological children. I suspect that the means for ex-cons would drop more if we could pull out the stepkids, but there is little evidence here that prison reduces one's number of offspring.    

3 comments:

coldequation said...

Obviously you're not going to have as many kids if you spend a significant chunk of your fertile years locked up in a cage. If convicts weren't in prison, you would see the usual pattern - people who shouldn't breed having the most kids.

Ron Guhname said...

"Obviously you're not going to have as many kids if you spend a significant chunk of your fertile years locked up in a cage."

True, but the average stay in prison is only 2.5 years.

Statsquatch said...

Given that prisoners have lower IQs than the general population that they are equivalent is suggestive of a Eugenic effect. If you matched the prisoners with people on the outside with the same IQ I bet the prisoners would have fewer children.