Add Health participants were asked to rate their intelligence. They were also given a vocabulary test--a decent measure of IQ.
Here are the Pearson correlations between the two variables listed by race:
Correlation (sample size = 6,504)
Asians .44
Whites .36
American Indians .35
Hispanics .28
Blacks .18
Overall, the correlations are low. People are not good at evaluating how smart they are. But the ability varies by race. Asians are the most accurate; blacks the least. Objectively smart groups (i.e., Asians, whites) assess their IQs with greater accuracy than low-IQ groups (Hispanics, blacks).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
Smarter people in general have better self-knowledge.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of those cases where the regression coefficients are more interesting than the correlation. If you regress rated IQ on measured IQ, do you get an intercept of zero and a slope of 1 (which would indicate that they are unbiased but error-prone).
ReplyDeleteIt would also be cool to see a plot of rated vs actual along with a 45-degree line, so that you could see the bias and also the lower spread for higher IQ people if that conjecture is right.
Maybe everyone rates themselves highly, and some people happen to actually merit it.
ReplyDeleteRobin Hanson is a persistent critic of the Dunning-Kruger effect alluded to.