Adolescents in the ADD Health Study were asked if they had intentionally injured someone in the past year. I estimated logistic regression models to see if: 1) non-Asian minorities (NAMs) were more likely to answer yes, and 2) are the racial/ethnic differences explained by lower IQs.
The coefficient for blacks is 0.34 (p = .001) and 0.24 for Hispanics (p = .013). The numbers indicate that members of both groups are more likely to have injured someone. When a measure of IQ is added to the equations (it's a vocab test), the results look like this:
Logistic regression coefficients
Hispanic model (n = 6,150)
Hispanic 0.16
IQ -0.01*
Black model (n = 6,154)
Black 0.28*
IQ -0.01*
* p < .05, two-tailed test
When IQ is entered into the model the Hispanic effect disappears. In other words, lower IQs explain why Hispanics are more likely to be violent. On the other hand, entering IQ into the model for blacks reduces the relationship between being black and violent, but it does not eliminate it. According to ADD Health data, other factors are necessary to fully explain high levels of violence by blacks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
Hey Malloy, when are you going to start blogging more?
ReplyDelete"Or perhaps, you are more likely to have injured someone if you are physically stronger, and Blacks are physically stronger than others at a young age."
ReplyDeleteIs that really true? I think I read that blacks are comparable to whites on average.
"Is that really true?"
ReplyDeleteI don’t know if it is true. Black babies mature faster than white babies. I don't know if they are effectively more mature by adolescence or even whether this would imply greater strength.
The more I think about it the less I like this hypothesis.
My guess would be that it does come down to (partly) biologically determined personality factors.
I recall reading of studies which show Blacks as having higher self-esteem as well as studies showing such is linked to higher rates of violence. Whether these latter studies controlled for race I don’t know.
Malloy, why do you claim puerto ricans are "black?" They have far higher degrees of black ancestry than groups like mexicans, but they're simply not "black."
ReplyDeleteAlso, if you're to use SAT scores as proxies for IQ, then puerto ricans have one of the lowest average IQ's of any hispanic group.
Still doesn't change how hispanics throw a big monkey wrench into the idea of IQ and crime being huge correlates.
The PR's do indeed have low IQ's. They do poorly in school and commit a great deal of crime. Their taste in clothing, music and lifestyle can be classified as barbaric.
ReplyDelete