Wednesday, September 10, 2008

To Luis (a Hispanic reader):

You have given me a good opportunity to say a word about the fact that many of my posts document the problems we see in the Hispanic community.

Let me say first of all that I'm surprised that such a sensitive reader as yourself did not complain about my many posts that reflect negatively on blacks, women, homosexuals, etc. One of themes I stress here is that, in contrast to past immigrant groups, the ethnocentrism of Hispanics does not seem to be fading, and all too many are not entering the cultural mainstream. You respond by standing up for your Latino brothers.

You suggest that I change jobs so I don't have to be around Hispanics, and if I'm understanding you correctly, I shouldn't hide the views presented on this blog from my students.

You can't be serious. If I talked in class like I write on this blog, I would be terminated in short order, no questions asked. It doesn't matter in the least that most of what I post is analysis of data. I push it as far as I can in class, but I'm no martyr: I've got hungry kids to feed.

This blog gives me the chance to publish all the things I can't otherwise. If we lived in a society that welcomed hard talk on issues like immigration, the Inductivist would be unnecessary. Our society generates so much race hysteria, you assume that because some white dude documents Hispanic social problems, he must hate Latinos and does not want to be around them.

I wrote in an earlier post that 98% of my interactions with Hispanics have been positive. I've known many fine folks: I attend mass with Latinos every week. The complaints I have about Latino students, I have for students in general: as a group, they don't give a damn. They're indifferent and incurious.

The difference between me and most people is that I take statistics very seriously. And, in contrast to messages from the mainstream media and punditry, Hispanics do not have the same numbers as Middle Class America. Their stats are troubling and do not bode well for their long-term assimilation.

But you asks, what's my point? Isn't that obvious? Blacks are a low-income group. Their population reduces the Middle Class nature of America. The same can be said of American Indians and Hispanic citizens. The fact is that all these folks are part of our society. We have to make the best of a challenging situation.

By contrast, Hispanic immigration is not an inevitability. It's a choice. Since I value an America dominated by middle class families, I document the low-income nature of the Hispanic community in order to make the argument that mass immigration from Latin America is moving us toward a divided society with a large low-income population at the bottom and a small number of elites on top, with fewer middle class folks in between.

One reason why America has been such a good country is because it has been a heavily middle class country. I want to keep it that way. Immigrants that are allowed to come to this country should be the type to raise that middle, not expand the bottom.

America's slide into the muck of liberalism is another concern of mine. One of the most important issues to me is abortion, and every year the country has hundreds of thousands of new Hispanic immigrants who are likely to turn their backs on their religious beliefs and vote for pro-choice Democratic candidates. Latino immigration is tilting the country left, and it doesn't have to happen.

At work and in social situations, our PC culture forces me to walk on egg shells. For me, a blog is a great place to let loose--sensitivities be damned. Face to face, my comments could easily lead to violence, but in this forum, you're able to see in stark terms how some people really think. Most whites are not like me because their thinking on these issues never goes beyond the superficial, so don't take me as an indicator of what your neighbor is really like. Almost all these folks are people with the best of intentions and good will. I'm the same way, only I'm mad.

And you detect my anger--it's not hard to. I'm not sure if I'm very good at self-analysis, but let's give it a stab. I was more or less apolitical growing up, although I was raised in a conservative home. Later, college turned me liberal. I thought of myself as a good guy because my main concern when voting was the welfare black Americans.

After a few years, out of belief that one can learn from all sides, I started to read conservatives. It surprised me how good some of their ideas were, but I remained unmoved. Then I started to read about all the anti-white animus that so many blacks felt. And I started to get pissed off.

Here, when it came to politics, I was more concerned about them than my own family. I was even willing to have my own children and other relatives stand aside so blacks could take their jobs and college spots--and the response I got was that I was an incurable hater and the cancer of humanity.

Basically, I've been pissed off about the whole PC racket ever since. If people get pushed too far, this is what you get. By nature, I have good will toward everyone, but when I start analyzing data and thinking about issues, I will admit that it makes me angry, and I see no reason to feel bad about that.


  1. And Luis ... Hispanics will continue to be angry at whites as long as they think that whites are oppressing them. And they will think that as long as they underachive and assume that is due to being oppressed by whites.

    Only when they understand that their average underachievement is due to their average lower IQ will they realize that their underachievement is not due to oppression by whites.

    Then they can "get over it" and try to improve their average lot by appropriate job choice, appropriate education, and appropriate immigration policies so that unskilled labor will be scarce so that unskilled labor will be able to demand high wages.

    Perhaps also genetic engineering so that the average Hispanic can have as high an IQ as the average white. Or even the average East Asian or average Jew.

  2. Anonymous6:42 AM

    I don't recall stating that I am angry at whites. Did I say something offensive and/or hateful? My statement about the neighbors was rhetorical -- more than likely, it is not true at all. As a matter of fact, I don't know any Hispanics angry at whites at all (I'm in the northeast; maybe it's different in other parts of the country?) Myself, my family and friends certainly aren't hateful towards whites. My acquaintances are very diverse, among them whites. And I agree with Ron on many (especially the social) issues. If you think we sit around sulking and whining about "how bad whites are", and try to carry on a "reconquista", I think you and many others are seriously mistaken.
    And to show you how ethnocentric and "hateful towards whites" we are, according to GSS in 2006, 21.6% whites opposed a relative marrying a Hispanic, 30.2% opposed marrying a black. Now, percent opposition among Hispanics marrying whites: 0.6%. Opposition to marrying blacks, 12.6%.
    (I used ethnicities Mexican, Puerto Rican and Other Spanish to get the Hispanic data, btw).
    But don't Blacks and Hispanics hate white people? Maybe I read something wrong. It probably has to do with my lower IQ....

  3. Anonymous6:48 AM

    oh, 7.2% Blacks opposed to a relative marrying a white. I forget to include that on my paragraph about the GSS findings.


Allelic variants found only in populations of African ancestry predict kidney disease and preeclampsia in blacks

Study Link Black women in the United States and Africa are at an increased risk for preeclampsia. Allelic variants in the gene for apolip...