People think that Americans of English descent have done the most for the country: The General Social Survey asked close to 1,000 Americans how much different ethnic groups have positively contributed to our society. The lists of countries the interviewers chose to include (shown below) is strange and was designed, I'm sure, to study prejudice and not achievement. But here are the results anyway:
Percent of Americans who say the ethnic group has made the biggest positive contribution (own group's view in parentheses):
English 31.0 (50.0)
Jews 12.1 (26.5)
Blacks 9.5 (29.7)
Irish 9.0 (15.7)
Japanese 8.9
Italians 8.1 (14.0)
Mexicans 4.3 (4.5)
Muslims 3.0
Puerto Ricans 2.9
Vietnamese 2.8
Cubans 2.5
The poor Germans who are only the largest ethnic group and have been here forever don't even make the list. I honestly don't know where many of these people are getting their answers from: you might think people say their own group is the best, but most of the time this is not the case. The percent saying their own group has done the most is in parentheses, and while the numbers are a larger than what all Americans together think, they're not not that much bigger.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
tino_g: What you say is plausible, but can you provide a reference?
ReplyDeleteI admire Mexican-American realism about Mexican contributions to American -- they were the only group that didn't rate themselves more highly than the rest of the people in the survey rated them.
ReplyDeleteIs there a link to the full results?
ReplyDeleteAnon: What you see is the full results. On this blog, I present my analysis of survey data.
ReplyDeleteIn 1790 (and up to 1830) UK folks were 90% of the European population and 72% of everyone, including blacks according to:
ReplyDeleteWikipedia: Immigration to the United States
citing:
The Source: A Guidebook of American Genealogy by Kory L. Meyerink and Loretto Dennis Szucs
US Population 1790
England 2,100,100
Scot-Irish 300,000
Scotland 150,000
Wales 10,000
Other* 200,000 * mostly English
----------------------------- %European %All
UK 2,760,000 90.0 72.4
Germany 270,000 8.8 7.1
Netherland 6,000 0.2 0.15
France 15,000 0.6 0.39
Jews 2,000 0.07 0.05
Sweden 2,000 0.07 0.05
Evidently, English ancestry goes back so far, or is so much like water is to fish, that people underreport it.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting that the group that overestimates its contribution the most is Blacks. I find that their position is often the most divergent from the averages on many other issues as well...
ReplyDeleteMost Black people errantly equate the pain and suffering of slavery with contribution to this country's l-t economic success. The greater truth is that the slave trade was very profitable, while the businesses that used them were marginal. This is similar to what happened in the CA gold rush. Gold mining commerce yielded much greater fortune than found gold.
ReplyDeletepIJZtm Good article! Thanks!
ReplyDeleteoC0csR Hello! Great blog you have! My greetings!
ReplyDeleteThe reference above to the 1790 U.S. population having 300,000 Scots-Irish, and apparently, no Irish, is patently inaccurate. According to the Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups (considered an authoritative and definitive source on this subject), in the year 1790, out a white population of 3.1 million, there were 400,000 Americans of Irish birth or ancestry, half descended from Ulster, and half from the other provinces of Ireland.
ReplyDeleteThe comment above that 300,000 Americans in 1790 were Scots-Irish, and, apparently, there were no "Irish," is inaccurate. Accoding to the Harvard Encyclopedia on American Ethnic Groups (considered an authorittative and definitive source on this subject), in 1790, out of a white population of 3.1 million, there were 400,000 Americans of Irish birth or ancestry, and that, of this group, half was descended from Ulster, and half from the other provinces of Ireland.
ReplyDeleteВ Голландии появилась новая услуга, [url=http://bit.ly/cAyr3E ]платная подруга[/url]
ReplyDeleteона поговорит с вами по телефону, составит компанию по магазинам, пойдет с вами в кафе и если нужно припрется наночь глядя с бутылкой вина поговорить по душам.
И ничего не потребует взамен, кроме 50 евро в час.
Какие слова... супер, блестящая идея
ReplyDelete[url=http://buyonlinelasixone.com/#2379]lasix online without prescription[/url] - lasix cost , http://buyonlinelasixone.com/#7961 lasix online
ReplyDelete