In the recent post on the fertility of wealthy white women, a reader raised the question of why conservative women have more children. He suggested it was greater religiosity and less involvement in the workplace.
We can use OLS regression analysis to help answer the question. I included white women ages 40-59 in households earning at least $100k in 1986 dollars. First, I regressed the number of offspring onto political orientation. The unstandardized coefficient is .161 (p < .05) which indicates that conservative women have significantly more babies. If we include church attendance, the coefficient drops to .120. If, instead, we include hours worked last week, the political coefficent drops to .132. If, instead, we include years of schooling completed, the political slope falls to .131. (The correlation between education and conservatism among wealthy white women is -.16--liberals tend to be more educated.) If all three controls are included in the model, the results look like this:
Number of offspring (sample size = 231)
Conservatism .081
Church attendance .098*
Hours of work -.007
Education -.081*
*p < .05, two-tail
With the three controls included, the link between poltical views and number of offspring falls to non-significance. In this full model, number of hours worked also has no significant effect on fertility. To put it in plain English, the data indicate that wealthy white conservative women have more children because they are more religious and less educated than liberal women.
One caution: education's effect is not the influence of IQ. Among this demographic, IQ is unrelated to fertility. The correlation between IQ and number of kids is .02--basically zero. Education's influence appears to be cultural.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
So sayeth Unknown, king of grammar.
ReplyDelete"Education" also sucks up a woman's prime childbearing years and usually burdens her with debt that probably further inhibits family formation.
ReplyDeleteBy which I mean to say that education's effect is not "cultural", but practical. Education doesn't culturally persuade women not to have kids, it just practically prevents them from having kids.
ReplyDeleteSo sayeth Unknown, king of grammar.
ReplyDeletesupreme
ReplyDeletejordan travis scott
hermes outlet
off white hoodie outlet
chrome hearts