Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
That's interesting and it is even more interesting that I just ran a similar ecological correlation suite on the United States, I got the following top Pearson correlation coefficients:
ReplyDelete89 with -PopulationMultiple2000to2001
65 with -ForeignBornMultiple1990to2000
61 with -TotalFertilityRate2003
61 with -FertilityRate2003
59 with -ImmigrantsMexicoPercapita1998
58 with -MalesPer100Females2000
56 with -AdultMalesPer100AdultFemales2000
55 with -BirthRate2003
44 with -AgeUnder18Percentage2000
43 with MedianAge2000
43 with -MethamphetamineUsingPercentHighSchoolFemales2001
42 with Age65AndOverPercentage2000
42 with -AirTrafficNonScheduledPassengersPercapita1999
41 with -WhiteTotalFertilityRate2002
Now, I'm probably one of the most anti-immigration people you'll ever meet, but it's hard to imagine a more contradictory result!
What's going on here?
Of some interest here is that I just ran -ForeignBornPercapitaMultiple1990to2000 and the r went from 65 down to 40 -- not as strongly contradictory but an anti-correlation.
ReplyDeleteCould you enlighten us statistically challenged on what a Pearson correlation coefficient means?
ReplyDeletePearson correlation coefficient is what people usually mean when they say "correlation". It's basically how well two variables (x,y) form a perfect line and whether that line has a positive or negative slope. It's basically how we know anything about the world (induction), and we know nothing of the world by pure implication.
ReplyDelete