Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
In the comments in the last post , some readers contended that Jews are not ethnocentric. Using the same question I used in the comments se...
-
I've been distributing a questionnaire to students which, among other things, asks them their religion. Quite a few have answered "...
-
Via a reader at iSteve, it looks like this might be the vocabulary test used by the General Social Survey. (Someone please tell me if I'...
That's interesting and it is even more interesting that I just ran a similar ecological correlation suite on the United States, I got the following top Pearson correlation coefficients:
ReplyDelete89 with -PopulationMultiple2000to2001
65 with -ForeignBornMultiple1990to2000
61 with -TotalFertilityRate2003
61 with -FertilityRate2003
59 with -ImmigrantsMexicoPercapita1998
58 with -MalesPer100Females2000
56 with -AdultMalesPer100AdultFemales2000
55 with -BirthRate2003
44 with -AgeUnder18Percentage2000
43 with MedianAge2000
43 with -MethamphetamineUsingPercentHighSchoolFemales2001
42 with Age65AndOverPercentage2000
42 with -AirTrafficNonScheduledPassengersPercapita1999
41 with -WhiteTotalFertilityRate2002
Now, I'm probably one of the most anti-immigration people you'll ever meet, but it's hard to imagine a more contradictory result!
What's going on here?
Of some interest here is that I just ran -ForeignBornPercapitaMultiple1990to2000 and the r went from 65 down to 40 -- not as strongly contradictory but an anti-correlation.
ReplyDeleteCould you enlighten us statistically challenged on what a Pearson correlation coefficient means?
ReplyDeletePearson correlation coefficient is what people usually mean when they say "correlation". It's basically how well two variables (x,y) form a perfect line and whether that line has a positive or negative slope. It's basically how we know anything about the world (induction), and we know nothing of the world by pure implication.
ReplyDelete