Percent who voted for Bush in 2000
All immigrant groups
low-income 45.5
high-income 30.8
Mexicans
low-income 46.3
high-income 37.5
Focusing on income rather than education doesn't change a thing: money moves them left. Contrary to expectations, poorer, less assimilated folks are not especially liberal. It's more accurate to say they lean Democrat. They become hardcore as they assimilate. Assimilation for immigrants leads them to become politically more and more like blacks.
Let's look at one more indicator that immigrant groups are moving to the social mainstream--job prestige:
Percent who voted for Bush in 2000
All immigrant groups
low-prestige 52.7
high-prestige 30.3
Mexicans
low-prestige 50.0
high-prestige 39.2
Same story. As immigrants move up, they move left and vote Democrat roughly 2 to 1. If conservatives want to survive as a viable political force, they must oppose immigration across the board.
So, what has all the pandering to immigrants gotten the Republican Party? A very clear message: go to hell.
And I'll say it again: neocons are either fools or liars, or both.
Ron,
ReplyDeleteDid you know that Irving Kristol headed an organization called "Coalition for a Democratic Majority" as recently as the eighties?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Kristol
This one page article traces neo-conservatism back to the Trotsky-admirers who started it,
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dmccarthy/dmccarthy23.html
Whaddya think of that?