One concern I have with legalizing behaviors that I view as immoral is that I suspect there is a reciprocal relationship between law and morality. Changing values lead to new laws, and new laws cause a change in values.
Using GSS data, I looked at the strength of the relationship between: 1) illegal drug use and favoring marijuana legalization, and 2) one's view on homosexual sex and favoring gay marriage. Eta-squared for the first relationship is .057 which indicates moderate strength. The gamma statistic for the second relationship is .79 which is very strong. Supporting a law, of course, does not logically require that one is in favor of the behavior in question, but sociologically the two seem to move in tandem.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are gun owners mentally ill?
Some anti-gun people think owning a gun is a sign of some kind of mental abnormality. According to General Social Survey data, gun owners ...
-
Which factor reduces family size the most? Below are the standardized OLS regression coefficients for a sample of whites ages 40-59: Stand...
-
More on trust: As a follow-up to the last post, I wondered about the level of trust in Asian and Muslim countries. Based on World Values Sur...
-
The plot thickens: As a follow-up to the last post, I wanted to see if the risk of arrest varies by hair color. I found that people with red...
So, in a sense, the slippery slope is (somewhat) backed up by statistical data?
ReplyDeleteNot really, although I think Ron is right as well. What you need to do is show cause and effect somehow. The GSS doesn't record individual respondents over time, so there's no way to see if, for example, people's opinion on gay marriage changed after sodomy laws were struck down, for example.
ReplyDeleteThe main evidence that the laws affect morality is the change in attitudes about race in the U.S. - the laws changed faster than people's attitudes (to the extent that there was violent resistance across the country), but the attitudes did change, rather than hardening.
ReplyDeleteSo, in a sense, the slippery slope is (somewhat) backed up by statistical data?
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting how you found a correlation between legality and societal views using GSS data. While it's true that supporting a law doesn't necessarily mean endorsing the behavior itself, these statistics do suggest a connection between changing moral values and legal changes. This observation raises important questions about the role of law in shaping social norms and attitudes. As society evolves, we must consider whether our laws should reflect those changes or if they should remain static regardless of public opinion. It will be fascinating to see how these relationships continue to develop over time.
ReplyDeleteNew Jersey District Court Protective Order
What are The Grounds for Divorce in New York State
Civil Protective Order In New Jersey
Dive into the world of Michael Jackson’s wardrobe. Michael Jackson Brown Jacket is a must-have for enthusiasts. Its real leather construction ensures durability. And guess what? Our winter clearance sale is on! Use code WINTER24 and explore the entire collection. Get yours today:
ReplyDelete